Amass is now in Claude's connector directory. Connect it in one click

Amass
Skills & PromptsTirzepatide evidence brief

Prompt

Tirzepatide evidence brief

Name a drug asset; get a citation-auditable Word evidence brief — pivotal Phase-3 trials, grounded efficacy and safety findings, and the trial↔paper links — every figure verbatim from Amass.

See the prompt

New to Amass? Connect Amass to Claude first

5Phase-3 trials
4efficacy claims
1safety signal
You getdocx1 file
Promptregulatoryclaude

The prompt

Paste this into Claude

Drug assettirzepatide
prompt
DRUG ASSET: tirzepatide

You have the Amass MCP connected (TrialCore + BioMedCore). Assemble a one-document EVIDENCE
BRIEF for this asset — citation-auditable, every figure traceable to an Amass record.

1. PIVOTAL TRIALS. Call search_amass_trialcore_records with:
     query = the DRUG ASSET, phase = "PHASE3", interventionType = "DRUG"
   Keep the registrational / outcomes trials. Build a table: NCT | Acronym | Indication |
   Sponsor | Status | Enrollment | Start — every field verbatim from the record.

2. EFFICACY EVIDENCE. Call search_amass_biomedcore_records with:
     query = the DRUG ASSET + key indication terms, minJournalQualityJufo = 2, isRetracted = false
   For each pivotal finding write one CLAIM grounded in a specific abstract. Quote the numbers
   (%, kg, HR, CI, P) VERBATIM from that abstract — never rounded, never recalled. Tag each claim
   with PMID, journal, JuFo tier, citationCount.

3. CROSS-CORE PROVENANCE. For one pivotal trial, call get_amass_trialcore_record and read its
   referencesBiomedCore links — show the trial record pointing at its own describing paper
   (NCT ↔ PMID). This is the publication↔trial graph no raw registry exposes.

4. SAFETY. Include at least one safety signal from a JuFo>=2 abstract, with its verbatim effect
   size — do not soften or omit it.

5. Assemble sections 1–4 as a formatted .docx evidence brief. Close with an AUDIT TRAIL listing
   every Amass ID and PMID cited, and a scope note: figures are verbatim from Amass records as of
   <date>; this is an evidence digest, not regulatory advice.

Why not just ask the model?

Ask a plain model for "a tirzepatide evidence brief" and it produces a fluent document with invented trial IDs, mis-remembered effect sizes, and citations that don't resolve.

  • Plain model: plausible NCTs, recalled (often wrong) effect sizes, unresolvable citations.
  • Amass: real TrialCore records (every NCT, sponsor, status and enrollment verbatim) plus a JuFo-gated, non-retracted corpus — the −20.8-point weight difference (PMID 37840095), the −5 mmHg systolic drop (PMID 39551891), the 2.15 retinopathy odds ratio (PMID 40637847) — each copied from the abstract, and the SUMMIT trial linked straight to its paper (NCT04847557 → PMID 39551891).

Honest scope

An evidence digest, not a label, a systematic review, or regulatory advice. The trial table is the Phase-3 drug set Amass returns for the asset, not an exhaustive program census; the efficacy and safety claims are a grounded sample of the high-quality literature, not a meta-analysis. Every figure is verbatim from an Amass record as of the run date and traceable by the PMIDs and Amass IDs in the audit trail.

More from the library

Keep exploring

csv
12targets scored
kinasekinase_family_chembl_leafsmall_molecule_tractabilityprotac_tractability
PLK1Other protein kinase PLK familyAdvanced Clinicalpredictive-only
WEE1Other protein kinase WEE familyAdvanced Clinicalpredictive-only
CDK1CMGC protein kinase CDK5 subfamilyAdvanced Clinicalpredictive-only
researchSkill

Target prioritization matrix

A general, interview-driven target-discovery workbench: name the biology and the modality you care about, and get back a scored table of candidate targets — druggability, DepMap essentiality, genetic constraint, curated safety, and the real number of drugs already targeting each — assembled from GeneCore intelligence and DrugCore/TrialCore/BiomedCore/PatentCore cross-links.

csv
2approved, first-gen

One-line read: approved, but already evolving. KRAS G12C went from "undruggable" to two approved drugs, and the field has immediately pivoted to a sec…

competitive-intelligenceSkill

Biomedical Evidence Scout

Name a drug, target, mechanism, or indication; get a landscape briefing that maps the published literature AND the clinical pipeline together — every paper and trial carrying a real Amass ID, PMID, or NCT you can check.

csv+1
7linked papers
ranktitlejournalpublicationDate
1Efficacy and Safety of NVX-CoV2373 in Adults in the United States and MexicoThe New England journal of medicine2022-02-10
2Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of the NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical TrialJAMA network open2023-04-03
3Safety, Immunogenicity and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 in Adolescents in PREVENT-19: A Randomized, Phase 3 TrialmedRxiv (preprint)2022-09-21
clinical-evidenceSkill

Trial evidence trace

Paste one clinical-trial ID; get the exact published papers that describe it — pulled from Amass's publication↔trial graph, with trust metadata and abstract-grounded relevance notes.

Run it yourself

Connect Amass to Claude and paste the prompt.

No build, no deploy — the connector takes about a minute, then this workflow runs on your own inputs.